Last visit was: Sun Nov 28, 2021 11:41 am
It is currently Sun Nov 28, 2021 11:41 am



 [ 4 posts ] 
 Chips vulnerable to light without the protective casings? 
Author Message

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 2:33 am
Posts: 165
Chips vulnerable to light without the protective casings?


http://hackaday.com/2016/05/05/dont-tak ... sensitive/

https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/xenon- ... cs-lesson/


Fri May 06, 2016 12:45 pm

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 8:03 am
Posts: 285
Location: California
When I attended a Microchip PIC seminar in the mid 1990's (when they were all EPROM-based, not flash, so erasable ones had a window), we were told to keep the window in the package covered even when programming so it would work right, even though leaving it uncovered would not give nearly enough light in the short amount of time to cause any erasure. Ten years earlier however, I worked in applications engineering at a VHF/UHF power transistor manufacturer, mostly in power MOSFETs, and we regularly had light on the bare dice when they were in circuits putting out their RF power. I suppose the much greater thickness of the layers in the silicon prevented trouble. The MOSFETs put out up to 150 watts each, continuously, at 175MHz. The bipolar transistors put out up to a thousand watts each (pulsed), at 450MHz IIRC. These were mostly for military radars.

_________________
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources


Fri May 06, 2016 5:49 pm WWW
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:43 am
Posts: 186
the 6502.org thread CF-CARD Read Problems goes OT at one point... :P

I wrote:
I once had a device that worked... but only in the dark. :shock: The problem was a sleeper -- and had nothing to do with unconnected CMOS inputs. Another time I accidentally created a situation where a program relied on the contents of one uninitialized byte of memory (which, after power-up, was unfortunately about 95% consistent).

barrym95838 wrote:
You didn't tell us the story, doc!

[the uninitialized-byte problem is described here]
I wrote:
As for the system that only worked in the dark, that was much simpler. I was using an EPROM-based microcontroller (MC68HC705), and in those days I never bothered to cover up the little window in the EPROM because I didn't know any better and had never had a problem. Fortunately, when my luck ran out a colleague informed me that photoelectric effects can upset the chip, and it really is best to cover the window so it's kept in the dark.

_________________
http://LaughtonElectronics.com


Sat May 07, 2016 2:40 am WWW

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:54 pm
Posts: 1644
[Oops, just posted a reply which turned out to echo Chuck's original links which I hadn't looked at...]


Sun May 08, 2016 5:12 pm
 [ 4 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CCBot, DotBot and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software