View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:44 am

Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
 Parallella, $99 "Linux Supercomputer" (with FPGA) 
Author Message

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:54 pm
Posts: 1074
This board is interesting in part because it has an array of parallel CPUs on it, but also it has dual-core ARM and a 32-bit-wide DDR3 RAM, on a chip with FPGA capability (the Zynq7010) - so could be a suitable platform for tinkering with CPU designs.



Presently available to those who sponsored the kickstarter but intended to be $99 retail. Perhaps late this year?

Parallella Overview
Zynq-7020 Dual-core ARM A9 CPU
Epiphany Multicore Accelerator (16 or 64 cores)
MicroSD Card
USB 2.0 (two)
Four expansion connectors
Ethernet 10/100/1000
HDMI connection
Ships with Ubuntu OS
Ships with free open source Epiphany development tools that include C compiler, multicore debugger, Eclipse IDE, OpenCL SDK/compiler, and run time libraries.
Dimensions are 3.4” x 2.1”


Sun Apr 28, 2013 8:03 pm

Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:40 pm
Posts: 148
Location: Huntsville, AL
I didn't examine the GitHUB repository extensively, but it appears Parallela's developers have released a set of Verilog FPGA interfaces.

Michael A.

Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:57 pm

Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 1:15 pm
Posts: 2
I've been looking for prices of the newer Xilinx FPGA SoC offerings, like the Zynq series. Been difficult to find at distributors like Avnet. I assume that Xilinx is still trying to work out the bugs through a very limited release strategy. After all, the Zynq family has been around for at least 6 months now.

Sat May 04, 2013 10:28 pm

Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 1:15 pm
Posts: 2
This is interesting stuff. A simple search led me to the explanation of a 64 core here. They geared it towards C/C++.

Sat May 04, 2013 10:35 pm

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 2:33 am
Posts: 165
I've received a lot of criticism for posting about it on other forums and some of the Xmos users helped me to put it into perspective a little.

"If you think about it for a second, is not that fast. The Core i7-980 @4.5GHz get around 95 GFLOPs compared to Adapteva 16-core at 26 gigaflops. *(even PS3 can do 150GFLOPS, and it has PPC CPU)"

The question is whether you can devise algorithms that can make good use of the Epiphany architecture. ... order=&x=0

Mon May 06, 2013 2:35 am

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:54 pm
Posts: 1074
Or the question is whether you could put together a Core i7 design nearly as small, cheap or low-power...

It's clear that the major idea here is to get to 64 cores or more. The 16-core device is an early iteration meant to get things going.


Mon May 06, 2013 9:11 am

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:54 pm
Posts: 1074
I see they have recently taped-out a 1024-core version, called Epiphany-V.
    1024 64-bit RISC processors
    64-bit memory architecture
    64-bit and 32-bit IEEE floating point support
    64 MB of distributed on-chip SRAM
    1024 programmable I/O signals
    Three 136-bit wide 2D mesh NOCs
    TSMC 16FF process
    4.56 Billion transistors, 117mm^2 silicon area
Tape-out means the design is final and is sent to mask-making. Then the masks go to the fab, and eventually chips come out the other end. "Chips will come back from TSMC in 4-5 months."

Announcement page: ... processor/

HN discussion:

Technical report:
(Contains lots of info about the implementation, including the amount of effort it took.)

The Epiphany includes is an in-order dual-issue RISC processor with the following key features:
• Compressed 16/32-bit ISA
• IEEE-754 compatible floating-point instruction set (FPU)
• Integer arithmetic logic instruction set (IALU)
• Byte addressable load/store instructions with support for 64-bit single cycle access
• 64-word 6 read/3-write port register file

Epiphany-V-Implementation.png [ 99.73 KiB | Viewed 5264 times ]

Epiphany-V-Comparison.png [ 98.55 KiB | Viewed 5264 times ]

Thu Dec 22, 2016 8:56 am

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:54 pm
Posts: 1074
From the HN discussion:

- the $99 board has sold around 10,000 units. Believed to be priced too high to get substantial volume.
- this new chip is going to be lower volume and much higher cost. Not for hobbyists
- Architecture reference at

Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:19 am
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 8 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software